Job-hopping has traditionally been
frowned upon in Japan. Since early in the postwar era, the Japanese have
viewed the employment relationship as a serious commitment for both sides.
In this relationship, the
company’s responsibility was to provide the employee with stable,
meaningful employment. Until recently, Japanese companies did not lay
workers off during economic downturns. By maintaining payrolls through
recessions, companies demonstrated that their commitment to workers
transcended the quarterly earnings statement. In return, employees were
expected to be loyal corporate citizens, and not be on the constant
lookout for a better situation.
While the bias against tenshoku,
or changing one’s employment situation, remains strong in Japan, attitudes
have moderated in recent years. Japan’s economic problems during the
recession of the 1990s forced employers to lay off employees. This
naturally altered the basic paradigm. If companies were no longer bound by
the old social contract, then no one could blame workers for exercising
more self-interest.
Outside influences have also
conspired to weaken resistance to tenshoku. Most major Japanese
companies have some form of relationship with North American and European
companies. Japanese businesspersons have seen that their Western
counterparts have no compunction about jumping ship for a better deal. (In
fact, I have known more than one discontented Japanese businessperson who
has switched jobs during or shortly after an extended work assignment in
the United States.)
Finally, the Internet has made the
process of looking for new employment much easier in Japan, as it has
elsewhere. Companies are also enthusiastic about online recruiting, and
numerous job-related sites can be found on the Japanese-language Internet.